Corporate Governance
Basic Policy
We believe in the importance of maximizing the interests of all stakeholders, including shareholders, customers, local communities, and employees. Our basic policy is to achieve sustainable growth and maximize corporate value over the medium to long term, while balancing the interests of all stakeholders and returning profits to them, directly or indirectly.
In addition, to fulfill our responsibilities to stakeholders and realize effective corporate governance, we have established the Alps Alpine Co., Ltd., Corporate Governance Policies.
< The Alps Alpine Group’s Corporate Governance >
To consistently improve our corporate value, we have established and operate a system that facilitates appropriate and efficient decision-making and business execution, the timely reporting of results to stakeholders, and sound, efficient, and transparent management.
Corporate Governance Structure
Alps Alpine has adopted a company structure with an audit and supervisory committee system as its organizational design, and the Audit and Supervisory Committee, which is independent from executive officers, audits and supervises the activities of the Board of Directors in close cooperation with accounting auditors and the internal audit department. In addition, the Nomination Advisory Committee and the Compensation Advisory Board, the majority of which consist of outside directors, have been established as advisory bodies to the Board of Directors. Through these measures, we will continue to enhance our corporate governance and realize fair, transparent, and highly effective management.
Board of Directors
We position the Board of Directors as an entity responsible for auditing and supervising business execution, striving to strengthen its monitoring functions. The Board of Directors deliberates and decides on key management matters, including basic management policies and the Mid-Term Business Plan, while ensuring opportunities for discussions aimed at medium- to long-term growth and enhancing corporate value.
In FY2024, the Board of Directors actively discussed the progress of management structural reforms, the formulation of the newly established Vision 2035 and Mid-Term Business Plan 2027 aimed at medium- to long-term growth, a review of the business portfolio, and shareholder return policies. In FY2025, the Board of Directors plans to continue discussions on enhancing corporate value, including reforms to corporate governance based on the evaluation of the Board’s effectiveness, as well as the realization of Vision 2035 and the achievement of the Mid-Term Business Plan 2027.
Skills Matrix, and Attendance of the Board of Director
| Position and Name | Knowledge and Expertise with Expected Demonstration of Particular Skills | Attendance at Board meetings in fiscal 2025 (rate) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate management | Technology / R&D | Manufacturing / Quality | Sales / Marketing | Financial accounting / Finance | Legal / Risk management | DX / IT | ESG / Sustainability | Global experience | ||
|
Hideo Izumi Representative Director, President (Chairman of the Board) |
● | ● | ● | ● | 21/21 (100%) |
|||||
|
Satoshi Kodaira Representative Director, Executive Vice President |
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 21/21 (100%) |
||||
|
Hiroshi Yamagami Director, Senior Vice President |
● | ● | ● | 14/14 (100%)* |
||||||
|
Junji Kobayashi Director, Vice President |
● | ● | ● | ● | 14/14 (100%)* |
|||||
|
Naofumi Fujie Director |
● | ● | 21/21 (100%) |
|||||||
|
Noriko Oki Director |
● | 21/21 (100%) |
||||||||
|
Hidefumi Date Director |
● | ● | ● | 21/21 (100%) |
||||||
|
Yasuo Sasao Director, Supervisory Committee Member |
● | ● | ● | ● | 21/21 (100%) |
|||||
|
Kazuya Nakaya Director, Supervisory Committee Member |
● | ● | 21/21 (100%) |
|||||||
|
Yoko Toyoshi Director, Supervisory Committee Member |
● | ● | ● | 21/21 (100%) |
||||||
|
Yuko Gomi Director, Supervisory Committee Member |
● | ● | 21/21 (100%) |
|||||||
* Regarding the attendance of Hiroshi Yamagami and Junji Kobayashi at Board of Directors meetings, they have served as directors since June 26, 2024, and the attendance reflects only meetings held after their appointments.
Knowledge and Expertise with Expected Demonstration of Particular Skills
| Corporate Management | Make accurate decisions considering the market environment surrounding the Company to achieve sustainable growth and enhance corporate value. |
|---|---|
| Technology / R&D | Maximize the use of our core technologies to create values of excitement, safety, and the environment. |
| Manufacturing / Quality | Ensure manufacturing and quality assurance necessary to provide products and services that earn customer trust and satisfaction. |
| Sales / Marketing | Create business opportunities in a rapidly changing market environment, accelerate the Company’s growth, and advance strategies for enhancing corporate value. |
| Financial Accounting / Finance | Align with management strategies to build a balanced financial foundation focused on growth investments, sound finances, and shareholder returns, and implement strategies and measures. |
| Legal / Risk Management | Establish appropriate governance structures, and respond quickly and aptly from the perspectives of legal compliance, internal control, and risk management. |
| DX / IT | Leverage data and digital technology to transform and streamline business and operational processes. |
| ESG / Sustainability | Contribute to solving social issues through our business towards realizing a sustainable society. |
| Global Experience | Develop and execute businesses strategies from diverse values and global perspectives. |
Appointment of Outside Directors
Alps Alpine appoints outside directors based on their wealth of experience and extensive insight as experts on business management, law, and accounting from an objective perspective to offer advice on and conduct oversight of Company management.
The independence of outside directors is confirmed on the basis of Company standards for the selection of director candidates, upon which outside directors, with their consent, are designated as independent directors and their designation is submitted to the Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc.
| Name | Reason for Appointment | Main Concurrently Held Positions |
|---|---|---|
| Naofumi Fujie | He has a wealth of knowledge in product development and management experience in the automotive industry. | |
| Noriko Oki | She is well versed in corporate analysis based on her many years of experience in the financial industry. | Outside Director, DISCO Corporation |
| Hidefumi Date | He possesses experience and knowledge in corporate planning, accounting, finance, and taxation, as well as experience in managing companies. | Outside Director, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank, Ltd. (Audit and Supervisory Committee Member) (present) |
| Kazuya Nakaya | He has a wealth of knowledge in product development and experience as a business practitioner in the consumer products industry. | |
| Yoko Toyoshi | She has a wealth of specialist knowledge and experience as a certified public accountant. |
Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member, Kokuyo Co., Ltd. Outside Director (Audit & Supervisory Board Member), Mabuchi Motor Co., Ltd. |
| Yuko Gomi | She has a wealth of specialist knowledge and experience as an attorney, and has accumulated a wide breadth of knowledge through her experience as a member of expert committees for government agencies. | Outside Corporate Auditor, NIPPON GAS CO., LTD. |
Outside Director Liaison Meetings
We hold Outside Director Liaison Meetings to share information with outside directors. Starting in FY2025, these meetings are held monthly and serve as a forum for exchanging views that transcend individual expertise, with themes appropriately set to enhance our corporate value.
Major Meetings of the Outside Director Liaison Meetings
| Date | Key Topics |
|---|---|
| August 2024 | Role of the Outside Director Liaison Meetings |
| November 2024 | Market evaluation and identification of issues at financial results announcements |
| February 2025 | Toward formulation of Mid-Term Business Plan 2027 |
| April 2025 | Enhancing the effectiveness of the Board of Directors |
| May 2025 | Preparing for the Mid-Term Business Plan 2027 briefing sessions |
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Board of Directors
Overview of FY2024 Evaluation Results
- <Purpose and Objective>
- We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors for FY2024 with the purpose of achieving more effective corporate governance and further enhancing the Board’s functions.
- <Frequency>
- Once per year
- 1. Evaluation Process
-
- Reported the evaluation method and schedule for Board effectiveness at the February 2025 Board of Directors meeting
- In March 2025, conducted a signed Board effectiveness evaluation survey of all 11 directors
- Held an exchange of opinions on Board effectiveness at the April 2025 management meeting
- Conducted a discussion on Board effectiveness at the April 2025 meeting with outside directors
- At the April 2025 Board of Directors meeting, discussed the opinions from items 3 and 4, and finalized the FY2024 evaluation
- 2. Survey Items
-
The main categories of the FY2024 survey are shown in the box on the right. To enable continuous year-to-year measurement, certain questions in the Board effectiveness evaluation survey are carried over each year, while other items are revised annually to improve the quality of the evaluation. For FY2024, the same survey items as in FY2023 were used in order to assess progress on resolving issues related to previously low-rated areas.
Additionally, open-ended questions were included to allow for a wide range of opinions and suggestions beyond the set survey items.Survey items
- Board of Directors size and composition
- Board of Directors operations
- Topics discussed by the Board of Directors
- Communication among directors
- Support system for the Board of Directors
- Operation of the Nomination Advisory Committee and Compensation Advisory Board
- 3. FY2024 Initiatives to Improve Effectiveness
-
Based on the results of the Board effectiveness evaluation in FY2023, our initiatives for FY2024 were as follows.
- Improving the preparation of materials for Management Meetings, including the Board of Directors
-
In FY2024, we clarified resolution items by including decision details in accordance with the agenda standards for Management Meetings. We also provided sufficient and necessary information for Board deliberation and oversight by preparing summary papers and distinguishing between core documents and appendices.
The FY2024 effectiveness evaluation survey indicated improvement over FY2023. However, there were also responses noting issues such as the way materials are organized, and the frequent use of technical terms and abbreviations, which made comprehension difficult. We recognize the need for further improvement.
- Ensuring Opportunities for Board Discussions to Enhance Medium- to Long-Term Corporate Value
- In FY2024, agenda items for Board of Directors’ meetings were ordered based on their importance and priority, ensuring that key topics were discussed first. We also developed an annual plan for important themes related to corporate value enhancement to secure sufficient time and opportunities for discussion. As a result, the FY2024 effectiveness survey showed that time was being allocated for discussions on value creation. However, due to the high number of agenda items, some discussions could not follow the annual plan, highlighting the need to review standards for items submitted to Management Meetings (i.e., further delegation to vice presidents).
- Review of the Board Structure
- In the past, both directors and vice presidents attended Board of Directors meetings. In FY2024, this was revised so that only directors attend by default, while vice presidents attend only for relevant agenda items. The effectiveness survey indicated improved communication between internal and outside directors and more meaningful Board discussions. However, it was also noted that opportunities for communication between outside directors and vice presidents had decreased, indicating the need for improvement.
- Review of Training Opportunities and Content for Officers
- In addition to regular training sessions for directors and vice presidents, in FY2024, we invited external lecturers to conduct a five-part nance training series (two hours each) for vice presidents. The evaluation survey indicated that continued training for both directors and vice presidents is necessary to further improve the quality of discussions in Management Meetings.
- 4. Overview of FY2024 Board Effectiveness Evaluation Results
-
Based on the 2024 effectiveness survey, discussions within Outside Director Liaison Meetings, and deliberations at the Board, the following points were confirmed regarding the Board’s effectiveness.
- The Board is appropriately sized and diverse, ensuring effective oversight of management
- Open and vigorous discussions take place among directors
- Appropriate disclosures and constructive responses to stakeholders (employees, shareholders, etc.) are ensured
- The Board engages in discussions on medium- to long-term strategy and direction
Based on the above, we concluded that the Board’s effectiveness was appropriately maintained in FY2024.
At the same time, we recognized the need to further enhance the initiatives undertaken in FY2024 to improve effectiveness.
- Continued improvement of materials used in Board and Management Meetings
- Securing and enriching time for discussions on key themes related to enhancing corporate value
- Providing further training for directors and vice presidents
- Improving communication among officers, particularly between outside directors and vice presidents
We will continue working to maintain and improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors, ensure thorough oversight of management, and pursue sustainable enhancement of corporate value.
Vice Presidents’ Meeting
We have introduced a vice president system to separate management oversight from business execution, aiming to expedite decision-making in business operations. Directors entrusted with key business executions by the Board of Directors guide and supervise the vice presidents responsible, significantly delegating executive authority to them in their respective business areas, thereby establishing a system for swift and accurate decision-making.
In addition, under the authority delegated by the vice presidents, executive managers have been positioned to carry out efficient and timely execution within designated operational areas.
Audit and Supervisory Committee
The Company’s Audit and Supervisory Committee consists of four members, two men and two women. It comprises outside Audit and Supervisory Committee members with extensive experience as lawyers, certified public accountants, and business managers, and inside Audit and Supervisory Committee members who are familiar with our business. The committee is chaired by an outside Audit and Supervisory Committee member to ensure that, as an independent organization, the transparency of our business activities and the effectiveness of our governance remains at a high level. Through attendance at important meetings, review of important documents, and interviews with the representative directors, other directors, vice presidents, and employees, the Audit and Supervisory Committee members audit the execution of duties by directors from an objective standpoint, independent of that of the Board of Directors. Through close cooperation with the internal audit department and accounting auditors, the Audit and Supervisory Committee endeavors to share its views at the Board of Directors’ meetings and other important meetings.
The Company has selected a full-time Audit and Supervisory Committee member to strengthen the monitoring function of the Audit and Supervisory Committee by exchanging information with directors and employees daily and by attending essential meetings to obtain information necessary for their activities as an Audit and Supervisory Committee member. The full-time Audit and Supervisory Committee member shares this information with other Audit and Supervisory Committee members and exchanges opinions at Audit and Supervisory Committee meetings, focusing on priority audit items to form audit opinions.
In addition, full-time staff with appropriate knowledge, ability, and work experience are assigned to assist with the duties of the Audit and Supervisory Committee, and independence from directors (excluding board members that are Audit and Supervisory Committee members) is secured for the employees in charge of such duties.
Composition and Attendance of the Audit and Supervisory Committee
| Position and Name | Attendance in FY2024 |
|---|---|
|
Director, Audit and Supervisory Committee Member Yoko Toyoshi (Chairman of this committee) |
14/14 (100%) |
|
Director, Audit and Supervisory Committee Member Yasuo Sasao |
14/14 (100%) |
|
Director, Audit and Supervisory Committee Member Kazuya Nakaya |
14/14 (100%) |
|
Director, Audit and Supervisory Committee Member Yuko Gomi |
14/14 (100%) |
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Audit and Supervisory Committee
Overview of Audit and Supervisory Committee Effectiveness Evaluation
The Audit and Supervisory Committee conducts an annual effectiveness evaluation to enhance its performance. The Committee analyzes its own effectiveness in monitoring and supervising the Board of Directors’ execution of duties. These evaluations are integrated with the Board’s own evaluation to clarify governance improvements and reflect them in future management. Specifically, all four Audit and Supervisory Committee members conduct self-evaluations on the Committee’s structure, operations, audit activities, accounting audits, and coordination with internal audits. Based on these results, the Committee discussed issues and countermeasures related to the management framework and mindset, nomination processes for directors and vice presidents, succession planning, coordination with the internal audit department, and comprehensive internal controls using digital transformation (DX).
The discussion outcomes are reported to the Board of Directors and shared with management to ensure ongoing dialogue and further improvement of governance.
Internal Audits
Alps Alpine’s internal audit department undertakes activities with the aim of contributing to the attainment of management targets by evaluating the effectiveness of the company’s governance, risk management, and compliance processes.
The internal audit department implements internal audits of the company and its subsidiaries in accordance with internal audit plans approved by the Board of Directors. The internal audits are performed to check that business affairs are conducted properly and lawfully from the standpoints of reliability of information about financial and operational matters; attainment of business targets; protection of assets; and conformance with laws, policies, established procedures, and agreements. Suitable advice on making improvements is then provided. Results of internal audits and areas identified for improvement are reported to the Board of Directors and the Audit and Supervisory Committee.
Under a three-way audit system, the internal audit department cooperates and liaises with both the Audit and Supervisory Committee and the company’s accounting auditor to ensure an efficient auditing process.
Nomination Advisory Committee and Compensation Advisory Board
The Nomination Advisory Committee and the Compensation Advisory Board were established as advisory bodies to the Board of Directors to enhance objectivity and transparency regarding matters related to the nomination and dismissal of directors, the selection and dismissal of other officers, and the compensation of directors (excluding those who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members) and other officers, as well as to improve corporate governance. The chairpersons of both committees are selected from the outside directors, and outside directors comprise the majority of each committee.
Composition and Attendance of each committee
| Nomination Advisory Committee | |
|---|---|
| Position and Name | Attendance in FY2024 |
|
Director Naofumi Fujie (Chairman of this committee) |
4/4 (100%) |
|
Representative Director, Executive Vice President Hideo Izumi |
4/4 (100%) |
|
Senior Vice President Satoshi Kodaira |
3/3 (100%)*1 |
|
Director Noriko Oki |
4/4 (100%) |
|
Director, Audit and Supervisory Committee Member Kazuya Nakaya |
4/4 (100%) |
|
Director, Audit and Supervisory Committee Member Yoko Toyoshi |
3/3 (100%)*1 |
| Compensation Advisory Boar | |
|---|---|
| Position and Name | Attendance in FY2024 |
|
Director, Audit and Supervisory Committee Member Kazuya Nakaya (Chairman of this committee) |
5/5 (100%) |
|
Representative Director, Executive Vice President Hideo Izumi |
5/5 (100%) |
|
Senior Vice President Satoshi Kodaira |
5/5 (100%) |
|
Director Hidefumi Date |
3/3 (100%)*2 |
|
Director, Audit and Supervisory Committee Member Yoko Toyoshi |
5/5 (100%) |
|
Director, Audit and Supervisory Committee Member Yuko Gomi |
5/5 (100%) |
*1 Regarding the attendance of Satoshi Kodaira and Yoko Toyoshi at the Nomination Advisory Committee, they have served as committee members since June 26, 2024, and the attendance reflects only meetings held after their appointments.
*2 Regarding the attendance of Hidefumi Date at the Compensation Advisory Board, he has served as a committee member since June 26, 2024, and the attendance reflects only meetings held after his appointment.
Considerations by the Nomination Advisory Committee and Compensation Advisory Board
| Classification | Details of the Consideration |
|---|---|
| Nomination Advisory Committee |
The Nomination Advisory Committee, in consultation with the Board of Directors, deliberates on CEO succession plans and reports candidates for directors and vice presidents to the Board of Directors. In FY2024, the Nomination Advisory Committee held four meetings to identify issues related to the officer structure from FY2026 onward, deliberate on the structure for FY2025, and report to the Board of Directors. The Committee also discussed the introduction of an executive manager system to strengthen both execution capabilities (ability and speed of execution) and control functions within corporate governance. Discussions on succession planning and the selection of officer candidates continue within the Committee. |
| Compensation Advisory Board | The Compensation Advisory Board, authorized by the Board of Directors, deliberates on the officer compensation system and sets specific amounts of compensation for each director (excluding directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members) within the limits approved at the General Meeting of Shareholders. In FY2024, five Compensation Advisory Board meetings were held. Compensation levels and structures, as well as performance-linked criteria and evaluation metrics, were discussed, taking into account data from external experts. Furthermore, the performance contributions of each officer were evaluated and reflected in their performance-linked remuneration. While encouraging decisive actions by officers, the Board also discussed introducing a clawback clause to strengthen corporate governance and ensure the trust of investors and stakeholders. |
Director Nomination and Compensation
The Nomination Advisory Committee and the Compensation Advisory Board were established as advisory bodies to the Board of Directors to enhance objectivity and transparency regarding matters related to the nomination and dismissal of directors, the selection and dismissal of other officers, and the compensation of directors (excluding those who are Audit and Supervisory Committee members) and other officers, as well as to improve corporate governance. The chairpersons of both committees are selected from the outside directors, and outside directors comprise the majority of each committee.
Nomination Policies
The Company has established criteria for the selection of directors and executive officers to ensure that those with sufficient ability and qualifications are appointed as directors. The Company’s policy is to nominate and appoint as candidates for directors and members of senior management those who possess exceptional management decision-making capabilities, foresight, and links, as well as a law-abiding spirit and high ethical standards.
Policy for Determining Remuneration
Established by the Board of Directors, the Company’s policy on officer remuneration is to encourage officers to work to improve the Group’s business performance and stock price to the greatest extent possible through a compensation structure that emphasizes a link with short-, medium-, and long-term performance, and thereby continue to enhance its corporate value.
Process for Determining Directors’ Remuneration, etc.
| Members | Compensation Determination Process |
|---|---|
| Directors excluding Audit and Supervisory Committee members |
|
| Board members that are Audit and Supervisory Committee members | The Audit and Supervisory Committee determines the amount of compensation. |
Types of Remuneration
The remuneration for executive directors consists of basic remuneration, bonuses, and restricted shares compensation (see figure on the right for composition ratio). It is designed so that higher positions have a greater proportion of variable compensation. Additionally, the compensation for non-executive directors is limited to basic remuneration, reflecting their role in overseeing the Company’s management from an objective standpoint.
The level and composition of remuneration (fixed remuneration and performance-linked remuneration) are determined with reference to external specialist survey data, and we are also introducing a clawback system starting in FY2027.
1) Policy on Basic Remuneration (Monthly remuneration)
Basic remuneration is paid monthly in the form of fixed remuneration in accordance with the officer’s position, etc.
2) Policy on Performance-Linked Remuneration (Bonus)
- Bonuses reflect Companywide performance based on a system that ranges between 0% and 200% of the standard payment amount established for each individual in accordance with business results for a single fiscal year. To promote management that is conscious of capital costs, operating income margin, pro t attributable to owners of parent, and ROE are used as evaluation indicators. For FY2025, the system has been revised to vary between 0% and 300% of the standard payment amount established for each individual to better reflect overall corporate performance.
- The performance and results of each individual are reflected in their bonuses through individual assessments conducted by the Compensation Advisory Board, and are reflected in additions or subtractions to the payment amounts calculated in 1. above.
3) Policy on Restricted Share Compensation
Restricted share compensation is paid based on the amount of restricted share compensation determined by position. The stock price reflects the market’s evaluation of corporate value, and by providing Company shares as compensation, the goal is to encourage management to focus on medium- to long-term corporate value enhancement.
To encourage executives to take leadership in promoting sustainability-related initiatives, ESG evaluation metrics have been included in the criteria for restricted share compensation. Based on our standards, calculated from the results of ESG evaluation agencies, the share remuneration amount determined for each position is adjusted up to ±20%.
Director Remuneration System
| Type of Remuneration | Eligible Recipients | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inside | Outside | |||
| Directors excluding Outside Audit and Supervisory Committee Members | Audit and Supervisory Committee Members | |||
| Fixed remuneration | Monthly remuneration | ● | ● | ● |
| Performance-linked remuneration | Short-term performance-linked remuneration (bonus) | ● | ||
| Medium- to long-term performance-linked remuneration (restricted shares*) | ● | |||
* The restricted shares are allocated based on the closing price of the Company’s shares on the business day preceding the date of the resolution of the Board of Directors, calculated from the amount determined by the Board of Directors within the range not favorable to the executives to whom the remuneration is paid.
Remuneration Composition (Median of System Design)
| Fixed remuneration | Bonus | Share-based Remuneration |
|---|---|---|
| 50 - 60% | 25 - 32% | 15 - 20% |
Remuneration Composition
| Performance Indicator | Weight | Calculation Method |
|---|---|---|
| Current-term operating income margin | 50 | The bonus amount is determined between 0% and 200% by scoring each performance indicator of the current term based on the bonus calculation standards established in accordance with the mid- to long-term business plan. |
| Pro t attributable to owners of parent | 30 | |
| ROE | 20 |
Design of Restricted Shares Compensation System
FY2024 Director Remuneration
(Millions of JPY)
| Classification | Number of Applicable Officers | Total Value of Remuneration | Total Remuneration by Type | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Remuneration | Performance-Linked Bonuses | Restricted Shares Compensation | ||||
| Directors | Excluding Audit and Supervisory Committee members | 6 | 206 | 145 | 26 | 33 |
| Audit and Supervisory Committee members | 1 | 26 | 26 | — | — | |
| Outside directors | 6 | 81 | 81 | — | — | |
| Total | 13 | 313 | 252 | 26 | 33 | |
Clawback Provision
Alps Alpine has in place a clawback provision that enables the company, through deliberation by the Compensation Advisory Board and approval by the Board of Directors, to request the full or partial return of compensation paid to executive directors or executive officers as bonuses or restricted stock units in the case of serious law violations or other misconduct. In the case of a downward revision of the company’s financial results after bonuses have been already paid, the company will reassess the bonus rate, given that financial results are used to calculate bonuses, and request the return of all or some of the paid bonuses.
Internal Control Systems
Basic Policy on Internal Control Systems and Their Establishment
In keeping with the Companies Act and Regulations for Enforcement of the Companies Act, Alps Alpine has established systems for ensuring the appropriateness of business operations. This is the company’s basic policy on the establishment of internal control systems. Through the enhancement of internal controls aligned with those systems, Alps Alpine pursues sound management and business operations.
Our Path toward Stronger Corporate Governance
| Key Corporate Developments | Composition of Directors | Key Governance Initiatives | Compensation System | Nomination and Compensation Committees | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal 2013 |
|
||||
| Fiscal 2014 |
|
||||
| Fiscal 2015 | |||||
| Fiscal 2016 |
|
|
|
||
| Fiscal 2017 |
|
|
|||
| Fiscal 2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fiscal 2019 |
|
|
|||
| Fiscal 2020 |
|
||||
| Fiscal 2021 |
|
||||
| Fiscal 2022 |
|
||||
| Fiscal 2023 |
|
|
|||
| Fiscal 2024 | |||||
| Fiscal 2025 |
|
|
|