TCFD-Based Information Disclosure
Response to TCFD Recommendations
In September 2020, Alps Alpine declared its support for the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). We will assess the risks and opportunities associated with climate change and reflect the findings in our business strategies with the intent of realizing sustainable growth and formulating an appropriate risk response.
Governance
Alps Alpine identifies “climate change adaptation and mitigation” as a material issue. The Board of Directors deliberates and resolves important matters relating to basic policy and action on climate change issues. The President and CEO possesses ultimate responsibility and authority relating to sustainability issues, including action on climate change. A director nominated by the President and CEO is responsible for overseeing all sustainability measures as chairperson of the Sustainability Committee. In fiscal 2024, the Sustainability Committee was convened at the highest level of management, attended by executive officers. This ensured close coordination with the executive decision-making process, as well as between officers, enabling prompt, timely action on important matters. And in June 2024, an ESG evaluation indicator was added as an assessment factor for determining compensation in restricted stock units with the aim of promoting proactive leadership on sustainability-related issues by executive officers.
The Sustainability Committee not only keeps track of the progress of various measures but also deliberates important matters and determines companywide policy relating, for example, to climate change and resource circulation as required. Specifically, the committee made reducing emissions at the product design stage a priority strategy for reducing Scope 3 GHG emissions after discussing a finding that Alps Alpine’s primary suppliers account for around 60% of the company’s Scope 3 GHG emissions. Regarding climate-related opportunities, the committee discussed results of an EU taxonomy alignment assessment and decided that the sustainability promotion department and Engineering Headquarters would cooperate on advancing activity leading to creation of environmental value. As for the company’s earlier material issue “contribution to decarbonization,” which was based on the view that mitigation of climate change was the paramount challenge, this was revised to “climate change adaptation and mitigation” in the new materiality in recognition of the need for adaptation to climate change, having acknowledged a certain level of extreme weather events would occur due to climate change.
Environment-related measures and key performance indicators discussed by the Sustainability Committee are reported to the Board of Directors.
Governance Structure of the Company for Climate Change–Related Issues
| Body | Roles | Meeting Frequency |
|---|---|---|
|
Board of Directors (Chairperson: Hideo Izumi, Representative Director, President) |
Sustainability policy decisions, including on climate change Determination of sustainability material issues, including climate change Oversight of climate change response |
Reports four times a year Timely deliberation of Issues |
|
Sustainability Committee (Chairperson: Satoshi Kodaira, Representative Director, Executive Vice President) |
Planning and implementation of measures addressing important sustainability issues, including climate change Provision of progress reports and recommendations to the Board of Directors |
Held four times a year |
Strategy
We have conducted a scenario analysis of climate change, and have identified risks and opportunities based on the results. This allows us to quantitatively assess the impact on our business based on internal criteria.
1) Scenario Analysis
Using information from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Energy Agency (IEA), we selected physical risk scenarios (RCP8.5, RCP2.6) and transition scenarios (STEPS, NZE), then analyzed outlooks under 4°C and 1.5°C scenarios. Given there is little difference in the temperature increase under 4°C and 1.5°C scenarios at the 2030 point, and due to the difficulty of predicting transition risks and opportunities from a business perspective at the 2050 point, we conducted the following combination of analyses.
| FY2030 | FY2050 | |
|---|---|---|
| Transition risks | 1.5°C or 2°C scenarios | - |
| Physical risks | - | 4°C scenarios |
| Opportunities | 1.5°C or 2°C scenarios | - |
2) Results of Scenario Analysis
From the results of the scenario analysis, we recognized the importance of addressing the increasing severity of extreme weather events and associated effects under a 4°C scenario with not only measures at company locations worldwide but also risk countermeasures encompassing the entire supply chain. From the 1.5°C scenario, we reaffirmed the need to continue measures contributing to decarbonization to reduce the transition risk, as well as to actively respond to product, service, and market opportunities relating to climate adaptation.
3) Assessment of Risks and Opportunities
The results of the Group’s assessment of risks and opportunities in climate change are as follows.
Risks were evaluated in terms of transition risks (government policy and regulation, technologies, markets, and reputation) and physical risks (acute and chronic).
| Category | Climate Change Impacts | Details of Risks | Timeline*1 | Financial Impac*2 | Response Measures | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transition | Regulations | Carbon pricing mechanisms | CBAM*3 was introduced in Europe in 2023 as a transitional phase. While currently limited to materials with high CO2 emissions, inclusion of other parts and materials and broader adoption by countries are expected. The risks are a higher tax penalty if low-CO2 materials are not used, and a higher cost ratio, affecting profits, if low-CO2 materials are used. | Long term | Medium | Conduct hotspot analysis for each product group and reduce CO2 emissions, starting with parts and materials with the largest impact. |
| Changing demand | Changes in customer behavior | There is an increasing shift away from company-level GHG emissions surveys to product-level carbon footprint surveys. The risk is a higher calculation workload. | Medium term | Small | Strengthen frameworks to incorporate product carbon footprint calculation tasks as systematic company-wide activity. | |
| Moves to reduce CO2 emissions in production are accelerating, especially in the automotive industry. The risk is losing competitiveness if there are delays in switching to or designing low-emissions materials. | Medium term | Medium | Conduct hotspot analysis for each product group and reduce CO2 emissions, starting with parts and materials with the largest impact. | |||
| Physical | Acute | Increasing severity and frequency of cyclones, floods, and other extreme weather events | Recent extreme weather means all regions are at risk of being hit by a large hurricane. The risk associated with a large hurricane is flooding due to swollen waterways. The same risk applies to production plants of both Alps Alpine and its suppliers. | Medium term | Small | Create flood risk maps for Alps Alpine plants and plants of key suppliers. |
| Chronic | Higher average temperatures | Higher average temperatures will increase the number of days of extreme heat, especially in summer. The risks are lower productivity due to exhaustion and higher energy costs due to higher air conditioning usage. | Long term | Medium | Deploy efficient energy-saving initiatives to contain energy cost increases associated with higher energy consumption by air conditioning systems; and introduce an internal carbon pricing system to enable a portfolio-oriented renewable energy procurement strategy. | |
*1 Short term: within one year. Medium term: within three years. Long term: more than three years (currently up to 2030)
*2 High: Up to 10% of sales. Medium: Around 3% of sales. Low: From 0.5% of sales
*3 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
Opportunities are identified in the areas of resource efficiency, energy sources, products and services, markets, and resilience.
| Opportunity Type | Climate Change Impacts | Details of Opportunities | Timeline*1 | Financial Impact*2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Products/Services | Development of new products or services through R&D and innovation |
|
Medium term | Medium |
|
Short term | Small | ||
| Development and/or expansion of low emission goods and services |
|
Medium term | Small | |
| Resource Efficiency | Use of more efficient production and distribution processes |
|
Medium term | Small |
*1 Short term: within one year. Medium term: within three years. Long term: more than three years (currently up to 2030)
*2 High: Up to 10% of sales. Medium: Around 3% of sales. Low: From 0.5% of sales
4) Risk Management
It is important that in order to achieve sustainable corporate growth and increase corporate value, the impact of various risk items surrounding our business be assessed. Measures should then be formulated and responded to over the medium to long term. We have prepared a risk map to prepare for risks and have identified climate change related risks as material management risks. Specifically, once a year, the Sustainability Promotion Office conducts a risk survey, and the identified risks are evaluated and managed by the Sustainability Committee. Risks with significant financial impact are reported to and discussed by the Board of Directors. Our domestic and overseas offices have obtained ISO 14001 certification and are continuously working to reduce their environmental impact based on environmental assessments.
Indicators and Targets
Alps Alpine aims to realize net-zero GHG emissions throughout the value chain by fiscal 2050. As a mid-term target to achieve by fiscal 2030, we will reduce GHG emissions (Scope 1 and 2) by 90% compared to fiscal 2021. This target was certified as a science-based target (SBT) in April 2024. Alps Alpine has also signed up to the RE100 initiative committed to sourcing 100% of electricity from renewable energy by fiscal 2030.
Alps Alpine will contribute to the reduction of GHG emissions through exhaustive energy conservation efforts and proactive use of renewable energy.
- Target for FY2050
- Net-zero greenhouse gas emissions across the entire value chain
- Target for FY2030
-
Scope1, 2 : 90% reduction
(compared with FY2021)
Scope3 : 25% reduction
(compared with FY2021)
* Applies to Category 1 (purchased goods and services), Category 4 (upstream transportation and delivery), and Category 11 (use of products sold), which account for a large percentage of emissions.
RE100 :
Source 100% of electricity used from renewable energy